TranskribatorTranskribator
Project decision log: template and completed example
Memory of the project

Project decision log: template and completed example

After a month it is important to remember not only what was chosen, but also why. Gather this story in one place.

The Transkribator team6-minute read
Why chose this path?OptionsThe reasonSolutionHistory is preservedCONTEXT NEAR
The reason for each decisionHistory of ChangeRecording Template
So as not to argue from memory

Decision log vs. meeting minutes

The team decided to release the first version without a personal cabinet. A few weeks later, the new participant asked why the cabinet was not made immediately. In the correspondence there are dozens of replicas, and the short task of “removing the cabinet” does not explain the restrictions. It is necessary to re-discuss the choice already passed.

The protocol keeps the results of a specific meeting. The list of tasks shows who and what does. The decision log helps to restore the logic of choice between meetings: what options existed, what relied on and under what circumstances the decision should be reconsidered.

Protocol

What was discussed and what was agreed at one meeting.

Tasks

What actions are needed, who answers and when to check the result.

The decision log

Which option is chosen, why it is suitable and what will replace it in the future.

Don't bring every work click here. Start with solutions that change the scope, timing, rules of interaction, or further options. If in a month the question is “why so?” will require searching for several conversations, the recording is likely to come in handy.

What can't be lost

Seven fields for a clear decision record

The fieldWhich question answers
SolutionWhat exactly chosen? Can we act on this wording?
ContextWhat was the task and what restrictions were in place?
OptionsWhat else were considered and what were the different options?
The baseWhy is this path chosen? What information is still an assumption?
ConfirmationWho is authorized to confirm the choice and when he did?
InvestigationWhat is changing in the work, what tasks should be created?
Revision and SourceWhen to return to the question and where to find the initial discussion?

The short cause is “so convenient” quickly loses its meaning. A more useful entry explains to whom it is more convenient and in what conditions: “At the start of the application, one manager processes, so the common box is selected before the second shift appears.” Here the reason and the possible signal of revision are visible.

Separate the confirmed information from the assumptions. “Users will not use the cabinet” – forecast until it was checked. “There is no time in the first issue to recover the password and profile” is a restriction that the team can confirm.

DiscussionOptions and conditionsThe choiceReason and ConfirmationActionsChanges in workRevisionnew circumstances
The decision does not end with the record: its consequences go into tasks, and the conditions are in check.
Educational situation

Why the team chose a request form

Fictional project: a small team prepares a recording page for a consultation. There are two weeks left before the launch. All the replicas and conditions below are created for example.

Training record fragment · 18:20
“In the first launch, we will leave the form and confirmation by mail. The personal account will require a separate check of the entry and restoration of access. When we see the repeated records and the need to postpone the time yourself, we will return to the office. I am responsible for this option as a project manager.”
Record in the decision log
The fieldExample of filling
ThemeMethod of recording for consultation in the first version.
Decision takenRun the confirmation application form by email.
The reasonIt is necessary to meet the current period; the personal cabinet requires additional scenarios and checks.
AlternativesPersonal account at once; application form now with subsequent revision.
Who confirmedProject manager, September 23, 2026.
What changesThe plan of the first version includes the form and writing; the tasks of the cabinet remain outside the scope of this issue.
When to reviewAfter collecting calls for re-recording and self-rescheduling time.
SourceDiscussion from September 23, fragment from 18:20. The full source is stored in the team's workspace.

Such a document shows that the Cabinet was not recognized as unnecessary forever. It was postponed due to the conditions of the first version. But the phrase “when we see the need” does not yet set the deadline for verification. In the real project, you need to set a date for a return to the question and the person who will collect appeals. Do not put them in the decision log retroactively without agreement.

The meaning is lost
They decided not to make a personal cabinet.
Context saved
In the first version, we use the application form. The cabinet will be revised after the collection of repeated scenarios; the current choice is related to the launch date.
Without a complex system

Decision log template

Template for your workSelect and copy
Theme of the solution:
Date and status: [discussed / adopted]
Context and limitations:
Options considered:
What is chosen:
Why choose:
Confirmed facts:
Assumptions to check:
Who confirmed the choice:
What tasks follow from the solution:
Source and timecode:
When and under what condition to review:
What solution replaces / which is replaced:

For the start, tables with links to more detailed records are sufficient. One short solution is placed in a line, a complex one in a separate card. It is more important to agree on a storage place than to choose the most functional tool.

DiscussedThere is no confirmation yetAcceptedAction can be plannedReplacedThere is a link to the new choiceThe previous decision remains in history
Status helps to distinguish the idea from the conversation from the current solution.
Order of renewal

How to update the log after meetings

  1. Find the moment of choice

    In transcription, look not only for “solved” but also fragments with options, objections and restrictions. Listen to neighboring replicas: later participants could cancel the preliminary conclusion.

  2. Check the confirmation

    The silence of the participants does not write as unanimous consent. If there is no clear solution in the conversation, leave the status “discussed” and formulate the question for confirmation.

  3. Link the record to work

    Specify the tasks that follow from the choice. The decision to “use the form” and the task of “preparing the form” are connected, but answer different questions.

  4. Save previous choice

    If conditions change, create a new entry and link it to the old one. For the former, indicate that it has been replaced. Do not rewrite the past reason as if the team knew the future result.

The decision log is also useful in the transfer of the project: the new responsible sees limitations, does not accidentally try to return the already rejected version and understands what assumptions it is time to check. At the same time, it does not replace the current task plan and does not make the discussion legally confirmed automatically.

Frequently asked questions

A closer look

Do I need to record all the team’s decisions?

No. Start with those that change the direction of work, affect a few people, or may raise a question about the reasons later. Domestic action is usually enough to leave in tasks.

What if the reason was not heard at the meeting?

Note that the reason needs to be clarified and ask the question to the responsible. Do not complete the reason for your impression or the answer of the neural network.

Can the decision log be restored on old records?

Yes, but mark the date of recovery and the source. Check if the decision is in effect now. If only the content of the conversation is known, and no subsequent confirmation has been found, and indicate.

Continue working with the recording