TranskribatorTranskribator
Interviewing a former customer: how to find out why they left
Customer research

Interviewing a former customer: how to find out why they left

Interview customers who stopped using the product to reconstruct events, alternatives and the moment they decided. Includes questions and a table for analyzing the reasons.

The Transkribator team5-minute read
SOURCEREASONS FOR LEAVINGPrevious task: highwork volumeChange: fewer projectsTrigger: another renewalAlternative: spreadsheetmaintained by handFROM WORDS TO RESULTS
Working with a real recordingIllustrated training exampleTemplate to copy
Customer research

One answer rarely explains the whole journey

A customer says “It got too expensive.” That may reflect a smaller team, infrequent use, an unfinished rollout or a better way of working. Ask what changed and how price factored into the decision without disputing the customer’s assessment.

Define what counts as leaving for your study: canceling a subscription, failing to return to the product or declining after a trial. These are different experiences. Keep the selection rule and explain any decision to group them together.

Workflow

Reconstruct the sequence that led to leaving

  1. Start with the original task

    Ask why the person started using the product and when they last got a useful result. Clarify the actual workflow. This helps distinguish a need that disappeared from one that remained but was no longer served by the product.

  2. Find changes and difficulties

    Ask the person to recall their first doubts and the events before them. Find out what they tried, whom they contacted and what happened. Let them tell the story in their own words before suggesting a list of reasons.

  3. Examine the decision point

    Find out what triggered the decision, what options were compared and who took part. Ask how they do the same work now. A new product is only one option. They may have canceled the work, put it off or done it manually.

  4. Compare with other evidence

    Tag interviews using the same structure and keep contradictory cases. If you have permission, compare the account with usage history while recognizing that it gives only part of the explanation. Estimating how common a cause is requires separate comparable data.

Worked example

Price prompted a review of usage

This is a fictional training example. The names, circumstances and outcomes are included solely to explain the method.

Excerpt from a training recording · 12:40
Once we cut back on projects, we logged in about once a month. When the renewal came up, we decided we could get by with a spreadsheet for now. We used to need the service every week when we had more work.

Renewal was the immediate trigger. The change in workload was an important circumstance. This account does not show that the product got worse or that a lower price would bring the customer back.

Ask which projects ended, what work remains and how well the spreadsheet handles it. The team’s response depends on those answers. A blanket discount has yet to be justified.

Previous task:high work volumeValueChange: fewerprojectsContextTrigger: anotherrenewalDecisionAlternative:manual spreadsheetNew approach
A timeline separates a gradual shift in needs from the final trigger for leaving.
Level of explanationExampleWhat to clarify
ContextThe number of projects fellWhen and how much the workflow changed
TriggerRenewal came dueWho decided
AlternativeThey work in a spreadsheetWhat is easier and what they lost
Team hypothesisThey need a different way to use the productHow to test in other cases
Ready-to-use template

Customer exit interview plan

Explain the research purpose. If the conversation turns into an offer to return, make it clear when the research ends and the offer begins.

Template for your workSelect and copy
Participant selection criterion:
Original task:
Last useful outcome:
What changed at work:
First difficulties and attempts to solve them:
When and why the decision happened:
Who took part in the decision:
Alternatives considered:
How they do the work now:
What remains unresolved:
Confirmed circumstances:
Hypotheses and how to test them next:
Check the result

Review the findings after the interview

  • The trigger and the circumstances that accumulated are distinct.
  • The interviewer did not argue with the customer’s assessment.
  • The alternative is described factually without assuming a competitor.
  • The conclusion is limited to the evidence.
SelectionType of departure studiedAccountEvents and actionsReasonsContext and triggerChecksOther cases and data
An interview reveals how a decision was made. Assessing how common each reason is requires separate analysis.
Frequently asked questions

A closer look

Should I ask about competitors?

Yes, if the person actually considered or chose an alternative. Start with an open question about how they work now, without assuming they purchased another service.

Can I compare users who declined after a trial with those who left after a year?

You can study both groups. Analyze them separately first because their experience, expectations and time to first value differ.

Keep working with the recording