TranskribatorTranskribator
Company knowledge

How to document a business process from an employee interview

Use an employee interview to document the real process: scope, participants, handoffs, and exceptions. Includes a diagram and a worked example.

The Transkribator team5-minute read
SOURCEPROCESS MAPRequest receivedDimensions provided?Yes → requestconfirmationNo → return to managerFROM WORDS TO RESULTS
Working from a real recordingWorked training exampleTemplate to copy
Company knowledge

Start with a specific case

“How does it all work?” often gets a broad answer: we receive, check, and fulfill requests. This hides where a request waits, who asks for details, and why work goes back. Ask the employee to recall the most recent completed request and walk through it in order.

The current process and a future design are separate documents. Reconstruct what happens today. Keep ideas such as automating a handoff or removing approval separate so the team can validate the actual process.

Steps

What to ask and how to use the answers

  1. Set the boundaries

    Ask what event starts this work and what counts as completion. “From inquiry to shipment” is too broad for a first interview. “From receiving the request to handing a checked package to production” defines a segment and a verifiable output.

  2. Reconstruct the handoffs

    After each action, ask who received the output, in what format, where it is stored, and how the next person finds out. An email sent and work accepted are separate events. A wait between them may be missing from the procedure.

  3. Find the exceptions

    Ask for examples of incomplete data, a return for rework, and an urgent request. Record the branching condition, next action, and decision maker. Avoid writing “usually within a day” unless the recording establishes when the clock starts and what is excluded.

  4. Check with a second participant

    Show the draft to the person who receives the output. Ask them to walk another real request through it. If the accounts differ, keep both and check whether the customer type, product, or work situation differs.

Worked example

Receiving a request to make a sign

The example is fictional. Names, conditions, and outcomes illustrate the method.

Excerpt from a practice recording · 12:40
I get the email and check the artwork. If the dimensions are missing, I send it back to the manager. I send it to production only after the customer confirms the dimensions.

There are two checks: dimensions must be present and confirmed. “Check the artwork” alone is too vague. The next person needs a clear indication that both checks are complete.

The branch in the diagram shows whether the package is complete. Customer confirmation is recorded separately in the handoff card. The manager forwarding an email does not replace it.

Request receivedDimensions provided?Yes → requestconfirmationNo → return tothe manager
The request’s route depends on whether the information is complete. Production receives the confirmed package.
StepWho does itVerifiable output
Check the packageCoordinatorArtwork and dimensions are present, or missing items are listed
Get confirmationManagerCustomer’s reply about dimensions is saved
Hand off to productionCoordinatorThe assigned person has accepted the package
Ready-to-use template

Process description card

Copy the template and fill it in for one case. Treat blank fields as questions to clarify.

Template for your workSelect and copy
Process name:
Trigger:
End boundary:
Case type and date:
Step / owner / input / action / output:
Who receives the result and how:
Where work waits:
Return condition and next step:
Source: recording and timecode:
Differences between participants’ accounts:
Who reviewed the description and when:
Improvement proposals, kept separately:
Result check

Walk a second case through the diagram

  • Each step describes an action.
  • Every handoff has a recipient and a sign of acceptance.
  • A return leads to a specific action.
  • The current state is distinct from proposals.
InterviewOne real caseRouteSteps and exceptionsCross-checkPeople involved in handoffsDescriptionTested on a case
The map is ready when it can reconstruct a real case.
Frequently asked questions

A closer look

Do I need to use BPMN right away?

A simple diagram and a table of steps are enough for the first review. A formal notation helps when participants understand it and the people using it later need it.

Can I describe a process from one transcript?

One transcript can provide a draft. Verify the actual order, exceptions, and responsibilities with other participants and real cases.

Keep working with the recording