TranskribatorTranskribator
Project change requests: how to document one after a call
Requirements management

Project change requests: how to document one after a call

Turn a client request into a change request with the reason, difference from agreed scope, impact, and decision. Includes an example and template.

The Transkribator team5-minute read
SOURCEPROJECT CHANGENow: company-wide reportRequest: select a branchOpen: records without a branchDecision: after impactassessmentFROM WORDS TO RESULTS
Working from a real recordingWorked training exampleTemplate to copy
Requirements management

Distinguish clarification from new scope

“Let’s add a filter” sounds small, but it may affect data, permissions, and testing. Find out whether the client is clarifying agreed behavior or requesting a different result.

A change request keeps the decision from getting lost in the discussion. A short card linking the proposal, assessment, and approval may suffice for a small project. The contract remains a separate source of commitments.

Steps

Understand the request before promising a date

  1. Keep the original wording

    Find the point in the recording and note the problem the person wants to solve. If they suggest a button, ask for an example of an action they cannot take today. Name the requester and the version under discussion.

  2. Compare with the original agreement

    Put the agreed and proposed versions side by side. State the concrete difference. If the behavior was already promised, it may be a fix. Check the documents.

  3. Assess what is affected

    Ask the team to review data, interface, integrations, tests, and support. Mark time and effort as estimates with assumptions until agreed. List what information would make the estimate firm.

  4. Record the decision and its consequences

    Set a status: clarifying, estimating, approved, deferred, or rejected. Once approved, update the related plan and test criteria. Keep the previous version to show what changed and why.

Worked example

Filtering a report by branch

This fictional example uses names, conditions, and outcomes solely to illustrate the method.

Excerpt from a practice recording · 12:40
The report currently covers the whole company. We want to select a branch and keep the overall view. Some older requests have no branch recorded.

The request affects more than the interface. Decide how to display records without a branch and how to handle the company-wide total.

Until you clarify blank values, you cannot promise that adding a list is enough. A separate card keeps that condition visible after the call.

Now: company-wide reportRequest: select a branchOpen: records without a branchDecision: after impactassessment
Comparing current and proposed behavior reveals decisions still to be made.
ItemDetailsStatus
ReasonNeed a separate branch viewConfirmed
RetainCompany-wide reportInclude in testing
ClarifyRule for requests without a branchOpen question
Ready-to-use template

Change request card

Use this template to discuss scope alongside your company’s approval process.

Template for your workSelect and copy
Change and requester:
Reason and example situation:
Current agreed behavior:
Proposed behavior:
What is retained:
Data and processes affected:
Estimate and assumptions:
Open questions:
Decision, decision maker, and date:
Documents updated:
How to check the result:
Result check

Make sure the decision can be traced

  • The request is compared with the previous scope.
  • The estimate is marked as preliminary.
  • The decision has an authorized owner and date.
  • Approval updates the work plan as well as the card status.
RequestClient’s problemDifferenceWhat changesAssessmentConditions and impactDecisionUpdated plan
A change request needs a decision before it enters the committed scope.
Frequently asked questions

A closer look

Does every clarification need a change request?

No. Draw a clear line around changes to the result, timing, cost, or significant conditions. If the project rules allow it, record small wording clarifications in the log.

What if people remember the discussion differently?

Review the recording and agreed documents. Show the relevant passage and ask participants to confirm its meaning. Discuss interpretations before choosing one.

Keep working with the recording